{"id":3477,"date":"2018-02-08T17:48:06","date_gmt":"2018-02-08T17:48:06","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/206.nmdprojects.net\/2017\/?p=3477"},"modified":"2018-02-08T18:59:34","modified_gmt":"2018-02-08T18:59:34","slug":"hactivism-intent-1-tate-yoder-tyler-rollins","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/206.nmdprojects.net\/2017\/hactivism-intent-1-tate-yoder-tyler-rollins\/","title":{"rendered":"Hacktivism Intent 1  &#8211; Tate Yoder &#038; Tyler Rollins"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><b>Visualizing Extreme Possibilities of Gerrymandering <\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Gerrymandering is the act of manipulating the boundaries of an electoral constituency or district,<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> to favor a certain political party &#8211; though complicated in theory and understanding and how it\u2019s <\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">is done, we propose that visualizing the extremes of gerrymandering will create country-wide conversation to address this unfair tactic in today\u2019s polarized political environment.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><b>Description:<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> We are doing this for the people. Ultimately we are not proposing an \u201cend all be all\u201d solution to gerrymandering, but rather creating a visualization to attract more people into this debate and raise awareness that there needs to be a better way to either create boundaries for our districts or create an entirely new system altogether that is more fair and just. \u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Gerrymandering has created the ability for there to be dramatically different end results even if every single person voted the same way. This is best illustrated with the photos above, particularly with photo 2. In the first instance, we see that 60% of the population voted with Blue, and 40% of the population voted for Red. However, in the second instance, if we just look at the end result, we see that there are a total of 5 \u201cdistrict\u201d votes for the Blue. This gives us the impression that there is no debate on who won, clearly, all the votes went to blue and therefore it is unanimous. This is wrong because still, 40% of the people voted for Red. The last example is where this method is the most unfair. Even though we see that 60% of the people voted for Blue, the end results show that Red received 3 votes, and Blue received 2. This, in theory, actually flips the percentages and makes it seem like 60% of the votes went to Red, and 40% went to blue. This is wrong, and this is being done in our political system right now.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In conclusion, as you can see with the images above, this is not our original idea. We are merely taking this example of showing the extremes for a state like Pennsylvania, and propose to do this for the entire country to show how dramatically different the end results are if gerrymandering is taken to its extreme.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Our method can be described in three different New Media strategy categories:<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">UPSTAGE THE MAN<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">By sharing this information throughout the country, we are able to educate citizens on how representatives are molding state districts in order to steal elections with the lowest votes possible. By exploiting this strategy we are able to give the proper information needed in order for the people to start a coalition and take back their voting voice. <\/span><\/p>\n<h3><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">AGGREGATE, AUTOMATE, AND VISUALIZE DATA<\/span><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The most effective way to share this data is by visualization. Because gerrymandering is done by breaking up districts on a map, it is important to show the effects of this process to the people whose votes are oppressed. <\/span><\/p>\n<h3><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">DISTRIBUTE AND CONNECT INFORMATION<\/span><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">There is no one spot on the web that compiles this information for people to easily access it in order to create their individual views on the subject. By compiling this information we are able to distribute it throughout the web through various outlets such as a website and\/or social media. Allowing people easy access is the first step to gaining attention on a subject. By connecting people with this information, we are able to curate new ideas and new networks for actual action to take place.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Budget, Materials, and Time: <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">If this can be done with one state, this can be done with all 50 states. We would need the voting information for an election (the most recent election would have the most emotional impact on the viewers) and to hire someone to dream up the most extreme examples of how gerrymandering can affect the outcome of the election. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Time:<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Roughly four months of consistent and intense work. We estimate that this kind of information is hard to find, as well as hard to read and create extreme examples of redistricting. However, we are positive that if it can be done with one state that it must be done for all so we can finally see the ridiculous nature of this practice.<\/span><b>Budget: <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The general overview of the budget contains paying a source for the information, paying for a website domain to present the visual, as well as hiring a designer and promoter to create and distribute the end result.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Visualizing Extreme Possibilities of Gerrymandering Gerrymandering is the act of manipulating the boundaries of an electoral constituency or district, to favor a certain political party &#8211; though complicated in theory and understanding and how it\u2019s is done, we propose that visualizing the extremes of gerrymandering [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":37,"featured_media":3478,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3477","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-intent1"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"http:\/\/206.nmdprojects.net\/2017\/wp-content\/uploads\/how-gerrymandering-works-e1518112065932.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/206.nmdprojects.net\/2017\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3477","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/206.nmdprojects.net\/2017\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/206.nmdprojects.net\/2017\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/206.nmdprojects.net\/2017\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/37"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/206.nmdprojects.net\/2017\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3477"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"http:\/\/206.nmdprojects.net\/2017\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3477\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3486,"href":"http:\/\/206.nmdprojects.net\/2017\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3477\/revisions\/3486"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/206.nmdprojects.net\/2017\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3478"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/206.nmdprojects.net\/2017\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3477"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/206.nmdprojects.net\/2017\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3477"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/206.nmdprojects.net\/2017\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3477"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}